This Means War

While the presence of two action stars and a title as menacing as This Means War, the film could be pretty intense. But actually it’s just a romantic comedy. Oh I get it; the title is a joke because the leads are fighting over a girl. Chris Pine and Tom Hardy star as CIA agents and best friends who both fall for a nice everyday woman, played by Reese Witherspoon. Since Pine’s character is a ladies man and Hardy’s a straight arrow, by the books kind of guy, Witherspoon just can’t make up her mind. So the guys begin a friendly battle to woo her and win her hand. It’s like The Bachelor without the weirdos.

For whatever reason, the film kept making me think it should be viewed at a drive-in. It’s probably because of the light, fun plot with moments of well-done comedy. But alas, the movie came out in February so I had to watch in doors. While more commonly found in drama, Hardy keeps up well with the always witty Pine. Even Witherspoon does well moving on after a few forgettable performances that have plagued her lately. Chelsea Handler is tolerable. Take that as a positive compared to how I would usually rate her.

The action moments with the agents fighting a villain played by Til Schweiger, are completely marginalized. While the film is about the romance, the threat of this master criminal tracking them only creates a problem in the last 20 minutes. The chemistry between Hardy and Pine ultimately keeps the film afloat. This Means War isn’t amazing, but it’s a fun movie. It’s nice to see Hardy in a role where he can smile sandwiched between his angry turn in Warrior and the biggest role of his career so far as Bane in The Dark knight Rises. Pine has the smart ass role down pat.

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.

Big Miracle

America’s initial reaction to the trailer for Big Miracle went something like this. John Krasinski, yes! Whales stuck in the ice, oh no! Drew Barrymore, not going to see it. That was definitely my reaction but being the trooper I am, I braved the unlikable Barrymore and saw the film. Based on a true story, it is about a small Alaskan town thrown into the spotlight after a family of whales is discovered trapped with a wall of ice separating them from the open ocean. Kransinski plays the small-time reporter who discovers the event and brings about the flood of attention. Barrymore unsurprisingly plays the annoying green-peace activist who thinks everyone is out to destroy the world.

I’m all for an actor sacrificing some unique aspects of a performance to go with what they know works. Krasinski plays a slightly more motivated version of Jim from “The Office.” That’s a good idea because people like the character and it’s likely why he got the part. As for the plot, it may not be a story told every day, but there is never a feeling that the film has something unique to offer. In the final third there are a handful of funny jokes and some big drama, which ultimately leave things on a good note.

In order to prevent every shot from having the characters looking at a hole in the ice, there are a few different storylines. With support from Ted Danson, Dermot Mulroney and Kristen Bell there is a surprising amount of star power in such an under-the-radar film. All do well in those positions. The main problem is Barrymore’s character and a lack of redeeming qualities. When the audience is meant to soften to her, we don’t and it’s unbelievable when the characters do. For the most part, Big Miracle is just middle-of-the-road good.

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.

Journey 2: The Mysterious Island

Why would Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, certified action star, agree to star in a questionable sequel to Journey to the Center of the Earth when he didn’t even star in the original? Well first of all, because The Rock does what he wants. And secondly, because Journey 2: The Mysterious Island isn’t as bad as you think. Josh Hutcherson reprises his role as Sean Anderson, who teams up with his step father (Johnson) on an expedition to find his grandfather, (Michael Caine) who is believed to be on “the Mysterious Island” written about in Jules Verne’s book of the same name. The film is very loosely based on the book, picking and choosing which aspects are adapted.

At times, especially early in the film, the plot develops like a work of fan fiction. The island turns out to be a combination of “The Mysterious Island,” “Treasure Island,” and “Gulliver’s Travels.” It seems like an interesting concept, but it reminds me of when I used to play X-Men meet the Power Rangers with my action figures. Choose a story and stick to it. Most of the time on the island is fine. There are funny moments and some excitement. Though they likely appeal best to a very specific demographic of older children.

Many of the cheesy aspects can be forgiven because of the character development, which actually works. The Rock is a likeable presence and shows he is not too proud for some corny scenes for the kids. I am referring to where he plays the ukulele and sings, a scene which lasts far too long. Luis Guzman provides some worthwhile comic relief. Caine however, proves he can be quite annoying when he wants to be in an unflattering performance. The movie is watchable and pretty entertaining at times, but there is no one north of 13 who can say that this is a well-made, quality movie.

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.

The Woman in Black

It is quite rare you will find me watching a horror movie. It’s even less likely in the theater. I find horror to be a strange genre, which targets emotions not meant to be expressed through entertainment. But I saw The Woman in Black. If any of a thousand different actors played the lead, I likely would have passed, but Daniel Radcliffe’s first film role post-Harry Potter drew me in. The story follows a young lawyer (Radcliffe) who travels to a country village on a job and encounters the ghost of woman who has long been terrifying the residents. Every time the ghost, who is known as the woman in black, is seen, a local child is killed in a mysterious way. Being the father of a young boy, these events resonate strongly with him. Though I dare you to watch a girl burn herself alive and then not be affected by it.

Since the film doesn’t take place in modern times and the horror is more from haunting rather than gruesome murder, it wasn’t unwatchable scary. It was very creepy, however. The script is interesting, well developed and most importantly aware of the film around it. There are moments where there could be more characters or more history, but it’s not necessary. The film runs just over 90 minutes, which proves to be the prefect length.

Radcliffe gives a solid performance on par with that of the two part Harry Potter finale. I imagine horror fans will be happy with the startling scenes and those who like less frightful dramas would also appreciate the story that is built. So, it would seem that I chose the right film to break my ban on horror movies. It is intriguing, interesting and no nightmares to speak of. With Radcliffe doing so well, The Woman in Black could use some more Harry Potter in the story… but then again, so could all movies.

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.

Star Wars: Episode I- The Phantom Menace 3D

Since this site didn’t exist when any of the Star Wars films were released, I have never given one a formal review. I am a fan of all six. Yes, you heard right, even the prequels. So watching Star Wars: Episode I- The Phantom Menace 3D is much less of a chore for me than other critics I have read. The film’s main storyline revolves around two Jedi Knights (Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor) who are sent to aid in negotiations between the planet Naboo and the Trade Federation who set up a blockade surrounding it. Though as they search for a resolution, the Jedi are faced with the emergence of their ancient enemy, the Sith.

While many point the finger at the film for being a complete failure, the actual flaw comes with only portions of the script. When Anakin Skywalker is introduced, the quality of dialogue drops instantly. Jake Lloyd doesn’t do the subpar writing any favors, but it is clear that George Lucas could have used some help with learning how children speak and present themselves. Neeson’s contribution as rebellious Jedi, Qui Gon Jinn is an often overlooked aspect of the story. He never falters even when Lloyd and Natalie Portman are drowning around him. He also gives one of the better complete performances as a Jedi throughout the entire series. The character is flawed and cocky, but still aware of his position in society. He tries to free Anakin and Shmi (Pernilla August). But he is not willing to go that extra mile and guarantee both their freedom.

Unknown to me before screening, this re-release is an extended edition, which does make some scenes too long. The one that stood out is the Pod Race. It is full of excitement and very impressive in the theater, but it brings the pace to a screeching halt and showcases mostly characters that don’t exist outside of this scene. For the die-hard fans, it would be the equivalent to the bounty hunters in Empire Strikes Back being showcased for half an hour. It would be cool, but not necessary.  And since I’m pretty sure my theater’s lenses were out of focus, the 3D added nothing to it for me.

Now to the one moment even the most fickle Star Wars fans latch onto, the lightsaber duel. With John Williams’ epic “Duel of the Fates” playing, Darth Maul (Ray Park) dominates Obi-Wan and Qui Gon with his double-bladed lightsaber before being cut in half. Awesome choreography, three of the film’s best characters, but why didn’t any of us ever notice how short it is. Split up by Ananakin’s space battle, Queen Amidala’s pursuit of the Viceroy and the Gungans fighting the droids, the lightsaber duel is only a few minutes long. It is likely still the best duel in the series though.

So to all those traditionalists, give The Phantom Menace some credit. It is meant for a younger audience and introduces Qui Gon and Darth Maul. There is a quality space battle and lightsaber duel in addition to unveiling the long dreamed about Jedi Council. Honestly, you’re the only ones still talking about Jar Jar Binks. We all let it go when Luke kisses his sister. Just move on.

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.

Chronicle

While many films may be enjoyable, it is still fairly rare that a unique film is released. There are a lot of superhero movies and almost as many found footage movies. But with Chronicle, the genres are combined to make an intense story about self-discovery and the difficulties of acceptance. That may sound a bit dull, but don’t get me wrong. Chronicle is a pretty intriguing project. When three teens, played by Dane DeHaan, Alex Russell and Michael B. Jordan, gain super powers after a strange discovery, they face decisions about how they intend to use these powers and what they mean for their lives moving forward.

The found footage aspect becomes a bit too convenient as DeHaan’s character learns to make the camera float exactly where a more traditionally shot movie would have their camera. But the use of security camera footage and cell phone cameras keeps the point of view intact. The relatively new actors do well to carry the film without big name support. Though the dialogue does provide a few hiccups, overall they play convincing characters. And inexplicably, the film runs under 90 minutes, yet still feels thoroughly developed. An impressive feat compared to most films.

Chronicle isn’t like any super hero movie you’ve seen. It is less about super powers and more about dealing with human nature. The three leads each represent different flawed approaches, none of which turn out particularly great for them. Though when one of them interprets his powers as a sign that he is meant to rule over others, we get a glimpse into the mind of every Dr. Doom and Magneto that comic book fans have grown accustomed to. The film’s ending is intense and agonizing, which pays credit to the young actors, as well as the quality script.

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.

The Grey

They may have nothing in common except for the lead actor, but to me, The Grey is the third in the Liam Neeson kicks everyone’s ass series. The first two, Taken and Unknown are a bit more urban. The Grey takes on the wild. When an oil drilling team’s plane crashes, Neeson’s character leads a handful of survivors on a trek to escape the pack of wolves stalking them. Now you may be thinking: how many people could wolves possibly kill? The answer is a lot. The story keeps an attention to realism, which explains why the wolves are attacking. Neeson’s character is built as knowledgeable enough to describe such things to the others, as well as the audience.

While it’s expected that “no name” actors would accompany Neeson on screen, The Grey actually has some known support. Dermot Mulroney, Frank Grillo and Dallas Roberts all appear in the film, even though it is difficult to identify them with their thick winter gear on. So while Neeson does carry the load for most of the movie, the others do well to give the lead a few scenes off here and there. But since the story unfolds like a slasher movie, I must say that everyone doesn’t make it home safe and sound.

While engaging, the sheer length of the film hurts the drama a bit. There is a span in the middle which has a number of consecutive scenes facing wolf ambushes. Even if that is an integral plot point, the script needs to show a bit of restraint.

At some point over the last decade Liam Neeson has become one of the biggest action stars in the world. But what sets him apart is his ability to show humanity between beatings. The Grey showcases this especially, as the flashback scenes with the character’s deceased wife surely hit close to home with Neeson’s own tragedy. It’s tough to watch. But the guy is likeable, tough and a great actor. In the words of Regis Philbin, “Liiiam Neeeeeson”. That should be read in a bad Irish/Scottish/ Australian accent.

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.

Man on a Ledge

My biggest question surrounding Sam Worthington and his two new releases (Man on a Ledge and Wrath of the Titans) is this: why does he have a mullet? Important, not really, but why would anyone grow a mullet these days? In the case of Man on a Ledge, maybe it’s to show his character spent time in prison. Worthington plays an escaped convict who positions himself on the ledge of a hotel claiming that he is going to jump. In the meantime, his brother, played by Jamie Bell and the brother’s girlfriend, Genesis Rodriguez, try to steal the diamond Worthington’s character had supposedly stolen and sold.

There is a lot of time spent on the ledge with the lead, but the film is almost always exciting. Elizabeth Banks plays a police negotiator, who helps to unravel the story for the viewer as she learns the details herself. There aren’t any weak spots in the cast with Edward Burns and Ed Harris also contributing strong supporting performances. The story could probably use a final revision though. The ending (spoiler alert) leaves a few holes in how things should have played out and there is the ever-dreaded neat and tidy ending. I think stealing in the name of justice is probably still frowned upon by the police.

Worthington and Bell are two very likeable actors who work well together. Even though they’re rarely on screen at the same time, it works. Bell’s bickering with Rodriguez gets a bit annoying though. While the premise doesn’t sound revolutionary, there is a certain amount of uniqueness to Man on a Ledge. The static positioning of the lead character on the ledge gives a home point to return to after flashbacks and action scenes occur elsewhere in the story. Maybe the mullet has some aerodynamic properties better suited for ledge standing?

Each film earns either zero, a half or a full arrow in five categories. The categories are Acting, Writing/Directing, Emotion, Innovation and Overall Impression. The arrows are added up to equal the full score.